Tuesday, April 29, 2014

School IPM 2015 Newsletter: April 2014

School IPM 2015: Reducing Pest Problems and Pesticide Hazards in Our Nation's Schools
School IPM 2015 Newsletter: April 2014
In This Issue
What's New?
Highlights
Upcoming Events
Look Out for Questing Ticks
School IPM 2015 Updated Priorities
Best Management Practices for School IPM
tr>
Receiving a forwarded copy?  Know of others who should receive this newsletter?
Find us on Facebook

Join the Schoolbugs listserv to ask questions, learn from others and share successes and challenges.
 

What's New This Month 

The Washington School IPM Program   
New resources available on the  Washington School IPM website! 

PEST2014 - A pesticide recordkeeping database for Washington public schools and licensed daycare centers.  This is an updated version of PEST2000.  New features of the database include the ability to input tank mixes on one record and the inclusion of application sites to the annual summary report.

A Classroom InPESTigation - A life science curriculum for grades 3 to 5. The curriculum is designed to promote students' use of science skills to gather knowledge about and address the real-world problem of pests.  The Next Generation Science Standards were used to guide its construction, and activities were crafted to promote learning through social, creative, and thoughtful problem solving.

PNW Pest Press Mosquitoes - Learn about mosquitoes and what you can do to help keep these blood-thirsty pests away from your school.



Highlights
May is Asthma Awareness Month!
Asthma Awareness Month (AAM) is right around the corner! How will you raise asthma awareness and action in your school community?

Plan educational events and activities for students, staff and parents using EPA's Asthma Awareness Month Event Planning Kit. Then check out how to effectively engage local media and broaden your school's reach through social media.

Share your activities with the AsthmaCommunityNetwork.org community by posting to the Events Calendar, Blog and Discussion Forum!
 

Celebrate #AsthmaAwarenessMonth in Your School and Beyond

Social media is a quick and effective way to reach your target audiences and expand your marketing efforts. Facebook reaches more than 1 billion active users monthly, and there are more than 200 million active Twitter users.

Consider using social media, like Facebook and Twitter, to promote AAM and events at your school and in your community. Use the sample posts below on your program's social media pages.
 


Upcoming Events

May 18-21, 2014
National Conference on Urban Entomology  
San Antonio, TX   

August 24-27, 2014
Association of Structural Pest Control Regulatory Officials (ASPCRO) National Meeting   
Missoula, MT 
 More Information

November 16-19, 2014
Entomological Society of America (ESA) National Meting  
Portland, OR 
  More Information

March 24-26, 2015
8th International IPM Symposium  
Salt Lake City, UT   
 More Information


Quick Links
*View this newsletter as a  PDF
Greetings from School IPM 2015!  
Every day, 49 million children attend school in the United States, served by nearly seven million teachers and staff.   But they're not alone.  Schools are also frequented by a number of pests including cockroaches, mice, dust mites and more.  Asthma is epidemic among children, impacting nearly 6% of school children nationally with rates as high as 25% in urban centers.  House mice and cockroaches are potent asthma triggers.

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a prevention-based, highly effective approach proven to reduce pest complaints and pesticide use by up to 90% in schools and other public buildings.  IPM practices such as sanitation and exclusion also improve food safety, fire safety and energy conservation.  Our newsletter highlights real-life examples of IPM in practice and can help you start an IPM program in your school district.  For more information, visit www.schoolipm2015.com. 

Look Out for Questing Ticks   
Depending on where you are located, hungry ticks follow an annual cycle, seeking wildlife, pet and human hosts as daytime temperatures rise in late winter and spring. Ticks feed on the blood of their hosts, sometimes transferring pathogens including Lyme disease, ehrlichiosis and Rocky Mountain spotted fever, which can have potential lifelong and/or fatal consequences.

How do these non-flying arachnids locate hosts? They stand absolutely still with their first pair of legs outstretched waiting for passers-by, a behavior called questing. In temperate areas east of the Mississippi, dog ticks (Dermacentor variabillis) typically begin questing in April, peaking between May to July, and declining around August. Lone star ticks (Amblyomma americanum) are active in April, peak between May to July and then suddenly slow at the end of July over much of their range.

Tick populations, and tick-borne diseases are spreading northward across the US, Canada and the UK. Scientists believe the expansion is related to changes in climate, and host population growth including deer and mice.

Tips to Avoid Questing Ticks
  1. Wear long sleeves and long pants tucked into socks.
  2. Avoid high-risk areas, especially forest edges, tall grass and weedy forest understory.
  3. Thoroughly check for ticks after time spent outdoors.
  4. Make your yard less tick friendly by mowing your lawn frequently, removing leaf litter and brush, storing wood piles away from your home and keeping pets away from heavily infested areas.
What to do if you find a tick?
  1. Carefully remove the tick with tweezers.
  2. Preserve the tick so it can be identified and tested if necessary.
  3. If you identify a blacklegged tick (Ioxodes scapularis), submit it to a lab to test it for pathogens.
  4. Visit your doctor to get tested for tick-borne diseases, especially if you think a tick was allowed to feed for more than 24 hours, a requirement for transmission of some pathogens.
  5. Send a picture to TickSpotters. Tick experts the University of Rhode Island will return an identification in exchange for the location information, which allows them to track distribution and incidence data nationally.
Other Resources
TickEncounter, funded and managed by the University of Rhode Island Center for Vector-Borne Disease, is a comprehensive, user-friendly resource for managing ticks across the US. Information is seasonally and regionally relevant, important because ticks behave differently in different parts of the US. The tick identification webpage ranks the most common ticks in a region and describes seasonal activities, diseases vectored, and pictures engorged ticks which can look quite different from their unfed state.
   
The Public/Private Tick IPM Working Group was launched last October, amid rising concerns over the spread of ticks and tick-borne diseases. More than fifty individuals from federal, state and local governments, Land Grant Universities, non-governmental organizations and others participate in this forum for communication, networking and collaboration. The Working Group hosts conference calls on the second Wednesday of each month and maintains a listserv. The group is currently completing a priority ranking survey before it moves forward with concrete projects and deliverables. If you are interested in learning more about the Group, contact Jane Petzoldt. The Group is funded by a grant from the USDA North Central IPM Working Group.

The Pest Management Strategic Plan posted at  School IPM 2015 also includes a section on ticks, including best practices for tick management on school grounds.
School IPM 2015 Updated Priorities
The goal of the School IPM 2015 Strategic Plan is to assess the current status of pest management in our school systems, identify priorities for management, education, research and regulation, compile our current understanding of best practices and set out a plan of action to achieve full implementation of IPM in all of our schools by 2015. The first plan was released in 2009.

Strategic plan priorities were recently updated through a ranking survey completed by all four regional School IPM working groups (Northeastern, North Central , Western and Southern). Priorities were ranked according to the number of votes each priority received during the ranking process, 51 working group members voted. The updated strategic plan will be available at the School IPM 2015 website later this year. Below are the top five ranked priorities for each section.

Management Priorities
  1. Track adoption of IPM practices in schools and disseminate economic, environmental and/or health impacts of IPM. Educate policy makers about the needs and benefits of IPM in terms of dollars, health, environmental and academic performance.
  2. Identify and piggyback with ongoing environmental health efforts and coordinate with partners in promoting IPM to help schools and child care facilities to meet healthy, high performance and safety, economic and energy efficiency goals.
  3. Create job-specific IPM guidelines for roles within schools.
  4. Develop IPM decision-making tools.
  5. Identify, educate and activate appropriate school-related organizations to embed IPM into the organizational culture.
Regulatory Priorities
  1. Establish IPM policies in school systems to institutionalize the commitment to IPM.
  2. Identify and promote interagency cooperation among regulatory, environmental, health, insurance, education, State and Federal, Cooperative Extension and other agencies.
  3. Create and mandate minimum standards for school IPM at federal level established through high level IPM training/licensing for pest management professionals.
  4. Implement and enforce existing IPM laws and policies at the highest level of economic and regulatory accountability.
  5. Work to incorporate IPM strategies into building codes.
Research Priorities
  1. Identify effective least-risk products and tools to manage pests and measure IPM continual improvement.
  2. Research the cost of IPM, including: implementation and education versus conventional pest management. Conduct a cost analysis for misapplication of pesticides (indoor and outdoor), calculate the cost savings of exclusion practices, research effectiveness of pesticides/pest treatments.
  3. Research the impact IPM has on indoor and outdoor school environmental health, e.g., school well water, school gardens, use of adjacent properties, children's health, (asthma, allergies, absenteeism, grades, ADHA), academic performance and safety factors.
  4. Research and evaluate outreach methods to determine most effective methods of school/community audiences.
  5. Evaluate building design, construction, renovation, and maintenance criteria.
Education Priorities
  1. Develop and utilize educational methods to provide education and hands-on training for custodial, maintenance, kitchen and grounds staff, school nurses, facility directors, administrators, teachers and IPM coordinators.
  2. Partner with pest management professionals (PMPs) and organizations to create and implement effective, economical IPM service relationships.
  3. Create best management practice for schools to use with vendors of pest management services, design and construction services, custodial services, food and drink product service providers, etc.
  4. Improve superintendents, principals and teacher pre-service training courses and develop curricula for training Extension, state legislators and other change agents.
  5. Create multi-state coordinated train the trainer programs on School IPM, e.g., resources for peer-to-peer training.
Several Current Projects Addressing Priorities 
The North Central School IPM Working Group, the University of Arizona and other individuals from federal, state and local governments, Cooperative Extension, non-governmental and non-profit organizations are currently working on Stop School Pests - A National Standard IPM Training Program. This project addresses the priority for educational, hands-on training for school staff roles and is funded by the North Central IPM Center and the Environmental Protection Agency. To learn more about the Stop School Pests training program, check out the  March School IPM 2015 eNewsletter article.

Texas A&M University, Salt Lake City School District and Colorado State University are currently addressing the priority to develop IPM decision-making tools through their work on iPEST, SchoolDude and the IPM Calculator, funded by the Environmental Protection Agency. The North Central School IPM Working Group is currently developing the Illinois IPM Association, which addresses the priority to identify, educate and activate appropriate school-related organizations to embed IPM into the organizational culture, funded by the North Central IPM Center.

Northeastern IPM Center funded Expanding School IPM Implementation within the Northeastern United States: a Best Management Practices (BMP) Approach, addressing the priority to provide succinct guidance documents and training aid for practitioners to use with vendors of pest management services, design and construction services, custodial services, food and drink product service providers and other vendors. To learn more about this project, check out the article below.  

The regional working groups continue to address the priority to identify and promote interagency cooperation among regulatory, environmental, health, insurance, education, State and Federal, Cooperative Extension and other agencies.
Best Management Practices for School IPM  
In 2013 the Northeastern IPM Center funded Expanding School IPM Implementation within the Northeastern United States: a Best Management Practices (BMP) Approach, led by Lynn Braband of Cornell University. This project evaluated, incorporated, and augmented existing resources in the development of a school IPM best management practices (BMP) website. They piloted the website in train-the-trainer events in three states and systematically evaluated the website through surveys, focus groups, and training events.

The project has led to improved resources and training which should increase the number of schools practicing high-level IPM, thereby safeguarding human health and the environment. The resources created are available on the website. 

Topics include:
  • IPM basics, why is IPM so important to schools?
  • How can your school benefit from using IPM?
  • Use of pesticides on school property
  • IPM policies and protocols
  • Common IPM terms
  • Pesticide use and IPM laws by states in the Northeast
  • IPM websites and other resources
Site-specific practices address both indoor and outdoor areas: cafeterias, kitchens, storage areas, classrooms, offices, staff lounges, hallways, locker rooms, gyms, pools, mechanical rooms, crawlspaces, walls, windows, roofs, eaves, athletic fields, fence lines, parking lots and sidewalks, low-maintenance turf and planting beds and gardens.

The project team encourages schools to utilize pest prevention and pest monitoring tools to reduce reliance on pesticides and to select least-risk control methods to minimize risks of human exposure to pests and pesticides.

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

School IPM 2015 Newsletter: February 2014

School IPM 2015: Reducing Pest Problems and Pesticide Hazards in Our Nation's Schools
School IPM 2015 Newsletter: February 2014
In This Issue
What's New?
Highlights
Upcoming Events
New Pest Control Product Evaluator Unveiled
Mailbag
Additional Head Lice Treatment Options
Receiving a forwarded copy?  Know of others who should receive this newsletter?
Find us on Facebook

Join the Schoolbugs listserv to ask questions, learn from others and share successes and challenges.
 


What's New This Month 

A new brochure on IPM for schools and day care facilities is now available.  It discusses all aspects of IPM, including pesticide safety.  
To view the brochure, click here
Order forms can be found here.
  
We welcome your posting any of the brochures, utilizing parts or all of the content, swapping the Syngenta logo with yours, etc. 



Highlights

"IPM-Solutions for a Changing World" is the theme of the 8th International IPM Symposium to be held March 23-26, 2015 in Salt Lake City Utah USA at the Salt Palace Convention Center.You are invited to submit a proposal for a session describing your program, activity, or research that addresses effective and efficient pest management.  The symposium sessions will be divided into tracks based on commodity or setting and will address various aspects of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) across disciplines and around the world.
Session proposals must be submitted online by April 25, 2014 for full consideration. Here is the online form:  www.regonline.com/IPMproposals

Upcoming Events
March 12, 2014
Bed Bug Ordinance 101 
Chicago, IL
More Information

March 13 & 14, 2014
Osborne Organics, Systems Approach to Natural Lawn and Turf Management Training  
Oconomowoc, WI 
 More Information
 
March 19, 2014
Deer Resistant Landscaping 
Whately, MA
More Information
  
 March 27-29, 2014
Green Schools National Conference 
Sacramento, CA    
 More Information   

April 6, 2014
Tick-borne Disease: Awareness, Prevention and Treatment 
Framingham, MA  

April 8, 2014
Lawn to Lake Sustainable Landscaping Care for Schools  
Grayslake, IL
 More Information

April 26-27, 2014
USA Science and Engineering Festival 
Washington, D.C.   

May 18-21, 2014
National Conference on Urban Entomology  
San Antonio, TX   

August 24-27, 2014
Association of Structural Pest Control Regulatory Officials (ASPCRO) National Meeting   
Missoula, MT 
 More Information

November 16-19, 2014
Entomological Society of America (ESA) National Meting  
Portland, OR 
  More Information

March 24-26, 2015
8th International IPM Symposium  
Salt Lake City, UT   
 More Information


Quick Links
*View this newsletter as a PDF.
Greetings from School IPM 2015!  
Every day, 49 million children attend school in the United States, served by nearly seven million teachers and staff.   But they're not alone.  Schools are also frequented by a number of pests including cockroaches, mice, dust mites and more.  Asthma is epidemic among children, impacting nearly 6% of school children nationally with rates as high as 25% in urban centers.  House mice and cockroaches are potent asthma triggers.

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a prevention-based, highly effective approach proven to reduce pest complaints and pesticide use by up to 90% in schools and other public buildings.  IPM practices such as sanitation and exclusion also improve food safety, fire safety and energy conservation.  Our newsletter highlights real-life examples of IPM in practice and can help you start an IPM program in your school district.  For more information, visit www.schoolipm2015.com. 

New Pest Control Product Evaluator Unveiled   
How do you identify which pesticide products are low hazard? Read the label? MSDS? What other sources of information need to be checked? How can you best organize all of the information to rank all of your options?

The Pesticide Research Institute (PRI) Product Evaluator is an online, subscription-based hazard-ranking tool designed to simplify the process. The tool provides information on human health and environmental toxicity for over 18,000 pesticide products.

How it all started
The Evaluator grew out of PRI's work with the City of San Francisco as the reviewer of pesticide products for San Francisco's list of approved pesticides, following the San Francisco Hazard Tier guidelines. PRI saw an opportunity to automate much of the work, using their databases on the chemical properties, toxicology and water pollution potential of active ingredients, and also invested in staff time to do the necessary label and MSDS reviews. The result is the PRI Product Evaluator that makes pesticide product hazard information more broadly available to a larger audience.
The Hazard Tier system denotes the level of hazard: Tier I = greatest hazard and Tier III = least hazard. Having the Hazard Tier rankings for multiple products allows for comparison of one product against another to find the one that best suits the IPM program.

The Product Evaluator also solves the problem of pesticide product cancellations or transfers that remove products on an "approved list" from the market. With more than 1000 pesticide products entering and leaving the marketplace or transitioning to new manufacturers in any given year, staying current on product information is a challenge that can now be easily managed with the new tool.

Streamlining the process
The PRI Product Evaluator is designed as a central resource for IPM professionals, LEED Accredited Professionals, facility managers, pest control operators, nurseries, golf courses, retailers and others to find low-hazard products. By pooling nominal fees from many users, PRI aims to build a support base to keep the product database current and complete.

Reports Dr. Chris Geiger, San Francisco Department of the Environment, "In the past, I had to either hire a reliable consultant to research pesticide hazard data, or spend many hours combing various online databases. Now, I can just push a button."

PRI's initial priority has been to ensure that comprehensive reviews are available for products used in structural pest control, landscape maintenance, invasive weed management, and turf pest management. The initial set of reviews is due to be complete by April 1, 2014.

Features
  • The database includes a selection of "exempt" products containing minimum-risk (Section 25(b)) ingredients and not requiring a Federal registration, but potentially useful as low toxicity alternatives in an IPM program.
  • The PRI Pesticide Product Evaluator uses the LEED-compliant San Francisco Hazard Tier Review System to assign a ranking to pesticide products. These rankings allow building managers and LEED APs to verify the eligibility of a pesticide product for use in a LEED-certified IPM program.
  • Gardeners will appreciate quick access to information on products targeting lawn weeds, slugs and snails, garden weeds, aphids and more. Users of the mobile app can freely access PRI's Pest Management Bulletins for more information on low-impact pest management methods through the app.
  • Users can search by Hazard Tier, active ingredient, pest, site, use type, and/or chemical classification and even print out a detailed report from the tool's product information page.
  • For organizations with a Group Subscription, groups can create a list of favorites accessible to all members in order to create an "approved" list for the organization to which any member can contribute.
  • Operators interested in becoming EcoWise or Green Shield CertifiedSM will also find this tool to be an asset when it comes time to finding and choosing low toxicity Hazard Tier 3 products.
  • PRI is in the process of developing the PRI Pesticide Product Evaluator iOS Mobile App, which will be available by April 1, 2014 through the Apple App Store. 

   
Mailbag
In response to our January articles about head lice and cockroach action thresholds, we received feedback from readers and some good questions. We've assembled an FAQ in response.

Head lice detection, or, it's complicated!
Q. Is screening for head lice in schools a useful role for school health professionals?
A. Published studies have not demonstrated a benefit to general screening of all school children for head lice infestation, e.g., at the beginning of the school year. Not all school health professionals are properly trained or have the necessary magnification tools to effectively confirm active infestations. False alarms result in needless stress, worry and treatment. However, children may benefit from school health professional attention at the start of the school year to establish a relationship, and to assess asthma, abuse, scabies, rashes or other causes of concern.

Q. Should all parents of children in classrooms where a head lice case is confirmed be notified and provided with information on signs and symptoms, and strategies to eliminate head lice?
A. Parents of children with a suspected or a confirmed case of head lice need to be discreetly informed and provided with information so that they can take steps to confirm status and treat if needed. The information provided should be accurate and complete, including how best to confirm if their child has head lice. There are no published studies that document the effectiveness of informing parents of children who may have been in close contact, vs. informing only parents of children exhibiting symptoms. Notifying parents other than parents of the child with head lice may result in unnecessary treatments.

For a thoughtful discussion on these topics including links to authoritative references, visit https://identify.us.com/idmybug/head-lice/head-lice-FAQS/why-were-children-sent-home.html  

More detail on cockroaches and thresholds
Q. Which cockroach species?
A. The German cockroach is the primary "domestic" species most frequently taking up residence within schools and childcare facilities. American and Oriental cockroaches and other species are less likely to establish breeding populations unless specific conducive conditions exist, such as access from sewer systems or very high moisture levels. So the thresholds apply primarily to German cockroaches, but a detection of other species in mechanical rooms, utility rooms or other areas where moisture and access to plumbing such as floor drains, merits an inspection for these other conducive conditions.

Q. How big is a zone and at what unit of time is the threshold being measured? Is it a count per day, per week, etc.? In which specific areas do the thresholds apply?
A. Use of thresholds presumes regular monitoring and an effective reporting systems for complaints including cockroach sightings. A single adult cockroach captured on an insect monitor, or reported as a complaint in food service areas, restrooms, classrooms, offices, locker rooms or utility areas is grounds for additional inspection and monitoring in the area where the detection is found. These are "pest vulnerable areas" where food, moisture and harborage can typically be found.

Visually inspecting for droppings in and around harborage areas, including cardboard and unsealed cracks and crevices, and food sources, such as cockroach-edible debris in hard-to-reach places, should follow a detection. Placing additional insect monitors in these areas can help determine if the initial detection was isolated or a sign of a growing problem. Detection of egg cases (ootheca) or immature stages signals a resident population and need for more aggressive action.

Q. What does a spot treatment entail? Which areas should be addressed and how?
A. The reader also recommended against using the word "treatment" to refer to both chemical and non-chemical approaches, as most readers will infer the former. A spot "response" involves addressing a localized area where a problem is suspected or has been confirmed.

Actions can include thoroughly cleaning and then where possible, sealing cracks and crevices including gaps between fixtures and walls, gaps where plumbing, conduit or wires penetrate walls, etc. Compressed air can be used to flush cockroaches out of these areas. Set up a sticky trap perimeter or vacuum up any cockroaches as they emerge.

Finally, if reasonable non-chemical measures fail to resolve a problem, gel, liquid or dry flowable baits can be applied in or near these areas. Use a bait within a bait station, or apply gel to a removable surface such as The Crevice®, so that bait can be easily removed once the problem is solved. Spray-applied liquids are generally less effective and are not necessary or recommended for cockroaches. These increase potential for exposure, repeated treatments lead to a buildup of residue, and these applications can interfere with baits by repelling cockroaches from treated areas. Remember that it is always prudent to require that any pesticide applicator in schools be properly licensed and/or certified. This is a legal requirement in many but not all states, and essential to ensure applicators meet minimum requirements for training.

Additional Head Lice Treatment Options    
In addition to the De-Licer® and Lice-B-Gone® lice and nit removal aids mentioned in our  January eNewsletter, alcohol-based Ulesfia®, and oil and alcohol-containing Hair-Clean-1-2-3® are options parents may want to consider. Hair-Clean-1-2-3 is sprayed onto dry hair and left for 15 minutes prior to lice and nit removal with a metal comb. Ulesfia is available by prescription and approved for use on children six months old or older. Products containing alcohol can be flammable and should be used with caution. The LiceMeister® Comb and NitFree Terminator™ are two metal combs designed specifically for efficient removal. Google any of these brand names to locate more information including source of supply.

Many other pediculicides (pesticides which kill lice including permethrinor pyrethrins) do not kill the eggs, and so require retreatment after seven days. Most labels warn against using these products on broken skin, which is not feasible given that lice-related itching leads to scratching. 

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

January School IPM 2015 eNewsletter

School IPM 2015: Reducing Pest Problems and Pesticide Hazards in Our Nation's Schools
School IPM 2015 Newsletter: January 2014
In This Issue
What's New?
Highlights
Upcoming Events
Head Lice: A Lingering Pest
Cockroaches: A Cause for Concern
New Year, Deep Clean, Fresh Start!
Receiving a forwarded copy?  Know of others who should receive this newsletter?
Find us on Facebook

Join the Schoolbugs listserv to ask questions, learn from others and share successes and challenges.
 

What's New This Month 

Several Penn State University graduate students created a number of natural enemy videos as part of a USDA NE SARE grant project. They are posted as "Pests and Natural Enemies" Youtube channel.  

Please check out this great IPM educational resource!  

********************************************

The Northeastern IPM Center has collected pages from the private diaries of pests and turned them into an annual report. We invite you to get to know some of the pests we face and learn about the Northeastern IPM Center's role in supporting IPM solutions. Click here to start reading!



 Highlights

The Pesticide Research Center has a great new tool called The Product Evaluator. This online, hazard-ranking tool provides information on human health and environmental toxicity for over 20,000 pesticide products! To learn more, click here.
 
**************************************** 
 EPA/NEHS Children's Centers 2014 Webinar Series, Protection Children's Health for a Lifetime.

The mission of the EPA/NIEHS Centers program is to reduce children's health risks, protect children from environmental threats and promote their health and well-being in the communities where they live, learn and play.

Join the webinar, Chemicals in Consumer Products Wednesday, February 12, 2014
1:00 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. EST

*************************************** Reminder!  The 2014 National Environmental Leadership Award in Asthma Management surfaces and illuminates best-practices in delivering environmental asthma management!
 Applications are due on
February 3, 2014, 11:59 p.m. EST


Upcoming Events
February 4, 2014
IPM Coordinator Training 
Lubbock, TX
More Information
  
 February 5th, 2014
Bed Bug Workshop  
Rockford, IL   
 More Information   

February 5th, 2014
Re-certification Workshop on Food Processing Sanitation and Pest Management  
Rochester, NY  


Quick Links
*View this newsletter as a PDF.
Greetings from School IPM 2015!  
Every day, 49 million children attend school in the United States, served by nearly seven million teachers and staff.   But they're not alone.  Schools are also frequented by a number of pests including cockroaches, mice, dust mites and more.  Asthma is epidemic among children, impacting nearly 6% of school children nationally with rates as high as 25% in urban centers.  House mice and cockroaches are potent asthma triggers.

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a prevention-based, highly effective approach proven to reduce pest complaints and pesticide use by up to 90% in schools and other public buildings.  IPM practices such as sanitation and exclusion also improve food safety, fire safety and energy conservation.  Our newsletter highlights real-life examples of IPM in practice and can help you start an IPM program in your school district.  For more information, visit www.schoolipm2015.com. 

Head Lice: A Lingering Pest   
Background
It would be great if the onset of winter would bring an end to all pest problems, but this could not be further from the truth. Winter is prime time for head lice outbreaks. Contrary to popular belief, head lice are not a sign of poor hygiene; in fact, lice are perfectly comfortable on a clean head. Six to twelve million cases of head lice occur each year in the US.

Lice eggs, known as "nits," are firmly adhered onto hair shafts, making it especially difficult to remove them. Each louse can live up to one month and produce one hundred offspring with regular meals of human blood. Head lice can be transferred by head-to-head contact, sharing hats, combs and pillows.

Screening for head lice in schools is a very useful role for the school health professional. Active infestations need to be addressed individually. Parents of all children using the room with any child with confirmed headlice should be notified and provided with basic information including description, signs and symptoms; strategies to eliminate headlice. The information should include where to go for additional help.

School districts vary in adoption and enforcement of the controversial "No Nits" policy, which states that any student with head lice, even a single nit, should be forced to stay home from school. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Association of School Nurses advocate that "No Nit" policies should be discontinued. Since lice do not spread disease or have any harmful effect other than an itchy scalp, requiring students to miss school is unnecessary and detrimental to their performance. The presence of nits alone is not a good predictor of infestations; only about 18% of children with nits alone will become infested with adult lice. Supporters of the zero tolerance policy, including the National Pediculosis Association, state that the only way to control and stop the cycle of lice infestation is to keep kids out of school until all nits are removed.

How to Spot Head Lice
Lice have three pairs of legs and are grayish-white in color. Nits are oval white cylinders that are about a sixteenth of an inch long. Lice prefer to lay their eggs near the ears and the back of the head.


Prevention and Treatment
Children should be encouraged not to share combs, hats or other personal belongings. Once an infestation is detected, non-chemical treatment options include washing clothing, pillow cases, sheets, blankets and other bedding material in hot soapy water and drying on a high heat cycle to kill all lice and their eggs. Use of lice sprays on furniture and toys is not effective. Non-washable items can be sealed in plastic bags for seven to ten days.

Manual removal of nits close to the head is always recommended. Fine-toothed "nit combs" are helpful. Combing and brushing wet hair damages lice and eggs significantly. Additionally, use of a hair dryer further injures adults, nymphs and nits. Botanical-based lice removal aids such as Lice-B-Gone® and De-Licer® may ease removal.

To remove lice and nits,
  1. Comb and divide hair into sections, use a metal fine toothed louse comb to remove nits and lice. After combing each section dip the comb in a container of hot soapy water to remove lice and nits.
  2. Repeat if nits are still attached within 1 cm of the scalp.
  3. Repeat until all the sections of hair have been systematically combed.
  4. Clean nit removal comb, clips, brushes, headphones, hats, etc. with hot soapy water.
For more information about head lice, download the USEPA guide: IPM for Head Lice in Schools (PDF).
Cockroaches: A Cause for Concern
There are a number of reasons cockroaches demand attention; they contaminate food with their droppings and decaying bodies, and transfer bacteria to food and food preparation surface. Cockroaches can multiply quickly, and cockroach debris is an allergy and asthma trigger.

Stealth behavior
Cockroaches have a reputation for evading human capture through their quick maneuvers and ability to squeeze through small cracks. Did you know that cockroaches have another survival trick? Like an acrobat, the cockroach can propel itself beneath a ledge by running at full speed, diving off the edge and then, at the last moment, grasping to the edge of a surface with hook-like claws on its back legs. The cockroach uses its momentum to swing like a pendulum and cling beneath the ledge, upside-down. This pendulum swing has a similar effect to bungee jumping, subjecting the cockroach to three to five times the force of gravity! Read more about cockroach stealth behavior here.

Identifying the American cockroach
The adult American cockroach is typically two and one-eighth to two and three-eighths inches long and has a glossy, reddish-brown appearance. Males have wings that extend past the abdomen, whereas females have shorter wings. They prefer dark, damp, warm locations such as floor drains, basements, sewers or storage areas. They are generally found in ground- level food storage areas and places where food is prepared.

Identifying the German cockroach  
The adult German cockroach is typically one-half to five-eighths of an inch long and is light brown in color. They are best identified by their small size and two dark parallel lines that run from the back of the head to the wings. Although their wings are fully developed, unlike the American cockroach, they cannot fly. The German cockroach is usually found in kitchens near dishwashers, stoves or sinks, preferring to hide in cracks and dark places where it is warm and humid.

IPM for cockroaches
The most effective way to control cockroaches is to prevent them from entering buildings and eliminate sources of food and water. Caulk and seal all holes and gaps that could serve as entryways or harborage, particularly in food service areas. Improving sanitation and making repairs are small steps that go a long way. Place sticky traps in infested areas instead of spraying in order to track movement, and identify locations of harborages to seal up. Use a HEPA-filtered vacuum to remove cockroaches and debris from harborages. Setting action thresholds, like those below, is one way to help determine appropriate actions.

Average number of cockroaches per zone
Action
0
None
1-2
Bait stations, check sanitation
3-6
Spot treat, add or replace baits, review sanitation
7-15
Thorough bait and crack and crevice application, revisit in two weeks
15+
Close facility and conduct thorough crack and crevice inspection and sanitation

To learn more about cockroach behavior, biology and IPM tactics, check out the University of Florida's IPM for Cockroaches in Schools.  
New Year, Deep Clean, Fresh Start!    
It is that time of year when we spend more time indoors. This can lead to more clutter, which can provide a perfect winter home for pests. Signs of infestation include droppings, holes chewed in pest-edible materials, and paper stashes in corners or behind and under appliance and fixtures. Here are some great tips for custodians and teachers to keep pest presence to a minimum:
  1. Identify, inspect and clean if necessary hard to reach places. These are often dark, hidden areas that require looking under and behind furniture, equipment and fixtures. Periodically inspect for food debris or signs of pests, moving items as needed for a thorough inspection.
  1. Untidy storage areas lead to accumulations of debris and hiding places for pests. Keep shelving and storage closets neat and orderly. Dispose of cardboard shipping containers when new shipments arrive and store pest-attractive materials in clear containers off the floor.
  2. Trash bins should be lined with thick trash bags that fit properly to ensure that trash goes directly in the bag, and that bags will not leak. Regularly wipe down trash bins and wash out the bottom to remove any build up of food for pests.
  3. Restrict food and drink to designated areas and clean up spills immediately after they occur. If food is kept in classrooms, dispose of perishable food at the end of each day and store non-perishable food in sealable containers. Make sure to report to cleaning staff any spills on carpet or in hard-to-reach areas as soon as possible. Implementing a school-wide locker clean out every month is a great way to ensure that food and drinks are not forgotten.
  4. Monitoring, inspecting and reporting are crucial to the success of an IPM program. Take notice of pest vulnerable areas (PVAs) which typically have potential access to food, water and harborage. PVAs are areas prone to infestation and require more intensive monitoring and inspection than other areas of a facility. Report pest-friendly conditions, or signs of pest infestation to the person in charge of receiving and taking the proper steps to resolve.